1/7/2011 4:06:40 AM
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 20: Outdoor Photography Subject: Digital Cameras Msg# 762299
|
||||||
I've long been aware of gray market and fortunately never been burned. I knew about the gray market, too, and that's why the sales guy had to lie to me to sell me the camera. It isn't worth saving $50-100to lose your warranty. I knew that Nikon didn't honor the warranty on gray market stuff but it never occurred to me that the company wouldn't fix any out-of-warranty camera they made and still had parts for at a factory service center at the owner's expense. I don't know how the gray market cameras actually get distributed to the U.S., but Nikon does, and it could stop the practice if it wanted to. I don't see gray market cameras made by any other company advertised here. I think Pentax, Minolta, Miranda and later on, Olympus film cameras have always fit into niche markets and all of them have made models that took good pictures. I bought my first 35mm camera while I was in the Air Force, a Nikkorex F that I think was actually made by Miranda. It was completely manual and I learned to set the shutter speed and aperture by reading the recommendations for "bright sunlight", "cloudy bright with distinct shadows" and "overcast with no shadows" that used to come printed in the instructions that came with each roll of Kodak film. I had already pretty well calibrated my eyeballs by the time I bought my first light meter (a Sekonic II as I recall). |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Your experience is a good lesson for all. I've long been aware of gray market and fortunately never been burned. I didn't know that the manufacturers sell direct to American resellers, but if you say so I won't argue. I always assume that big NY and west coast outfits bought from overseas distributors and imported them themselves. That always made more sense to me as to how non-U.S. market cameras got into the USA. Today it seems that the cameras intended for Euro market are named differently, at least in the consumer and prosumer markets, perhaps not with pro cameras? I have been using Pentax, which has never been a true competitor for Nikon or even Canon, but as good or better than anyone else (I'd rank Olympus and Minolta up there) for at least thirty years, and own some bodies older than that, and have never had a failure either. The worst problem I've had is some ancient foam padding inside motor drives get gummy on me. I think I told Joe I still have four old film bodies--I lied--I have five. Two are 100% manual! Bottom line--I can use any lens Pentax has ever made on the very latest Pentax DSLR. If I get an adpator I could use SCREW MOUNT lenses. I don't have any, but good grief. I do have some pretty old bayonet mount lenses and have in fact used them. HOW IS THAT FOR SUPPORT? |